Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1223

reference
923-tree-1
name
1223
tree-preservation-order

undefined

923-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.027236 50.869242)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.027208 50.869239,-1.027209 50.869244,-1.027213 50.869249,-1.027219 50.869253,-1.027227 50.869256,-1.027236 50.869257,-1.027244 50.869256,-1.027259 50.869250,-1.027263 50.869245,-1.027264 50.869239,-1.027263 50.869233,-1.027259 50.869228,-1.027253 50.869224,-1.027236 50.869221,-1.027220 50.869224,-1.027213 50.869228,-1.027209 50.869233,-1.027208 50.869239)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL